Moby Ben, or, The Washington Super-Whale: Hedge Fundies, The Federal Reserve, and Bernanke-Hatred
Brad DeLong
Att. Jason Richwine: You're Not the First Guy to (Wrongly) Believe Immigrants are Dumb
Dana Goldstein
Full Employment: Is Labor-Saving Technology Making It Harder to Get There?
Jared Bernstein
Markets, Power, and Economic Policy
Jared Bernstein
Mark Thoma and Noah Smith on the motivations for austerity.
Central Bank Competence Is A Technology
Karl Smith
19 May 2013
17 May 2013
15 May 2013
Quote of the Day - Chris Hayes on Inequality, Broadly
"Along with all of the other rising inequalities we've become so familiar with -- in income, in wealth, in access to politicians -- we confront now a fundamental inequality of accountability.
"We can have a just society whose guiding ethos is accountability and punishment, where both black kids dealing weed in Harlem and investment bankers peddling fraudulent securities on Wall Street are forced to pay for their crimes, or we can have a just society whose guiding ethos is forgiveness and second chances, one in which both Wall Street banks and foreclosed households are bailed out, in which both inside traders and street felons are allowed to rejoin polite society with the full privileges of citizenship intact.
"But we cannot have a just society that applies the principle of accountability to the powerless and the principle of forgiveness to the powerful. This is the America in which we currently reside."
-Chris Hayes
"We can have a just society whose guiding ethos is accountability and punishment, where both black kids dealing weed in Harlem and investment bankers peddling fraudulent securities on Wall Street are forced to pay for their crimes, or we can have a just society whose guiding ethos is forgiveness and second chances, one in which both Wall Street banks and foreclosed households are bailed out, in which both inside traders and street felons are allowed to rejoin polite society with the full privileges of citizenship intact.
"But we cannot have a just society that applies the principle of accountability to the powerless and the principle of forgiveness to the powerful. This is the America in which we currently reside."
-Chris Hayes
Filed under:
quote
13 May 2013
Agency Costs in the Mortgage Securitization Market
Many theories exist that purport to explain the Financial Crisis of 2008 and the subsequent recession, the aftereffects of which are still felt in 2012. While the story of the private mortgage security market is part of the overall story of the Crisis, no single facet of the Crisis taken in isolation can possibly explain the entire narrative. Nor is the story of private mortgage securities simply a story from the last decade, a footnote to the Crisis and its run-up. Mortgage securities have existed in the United States for over forty years, and mortgage securities created by private firms for thirty. And despite their potential to create havoc, mortgage-backed securities (MBS) are an essential component of housing finance, and are likely to remain so for the foreseeable future.
[This paper has a lot of equations, and the formatting constraints of this platform make posting it in its entirety not feasible. Please follow this link if you'd like to read the whole paper.]
The list below is a miniature bibliography. "Miniature" in the sense that I have no pretense to completeness. I will just post links below that are relevant as I find them. Feel free to suggest something in the comments.
Did Securitization Lead to Riskier Corporate Lending? João Santos
Did the Rise of CLOs Lead to Riskier Lending? Vitaly Bord and João A. C. Santos
Did Securitization Lead to Lax Screening? Evidence from Subprime Loans Benjamin J. Keys, Tanmoy Mukherjee, Amit Seru, and Vikrant Vig
[This paper has a lot of equations, and the formatting constraints of this platform make posting it in its entirety not feasible. Please follow this link if you'd like to read the whole paper.]
The list below is a miniature bibliography. "Miniature" in the sense that I have no pretense to completeness. I will just post links below that are relevant as I find them. Feel free to suggest something in the comments.
Did Securitization Lead to Riskier Corporate Lending? João Santos
Did the Rise of CLOs Lead to Riskier Lending? Vitaly Bord and João A. C. Santos
Did Securitization Lead to Lax Screening? Evidence from Subprime Loans Benjamin J. Keys, Tanmoy Mukherjee, Amit Seru, and Vikrant Vig
Filed under:
academic
12 May 2013
Links of the Week - 10 May 2013
Another big one this week. -ed.
The Four Noble Truths of Full Employment
Jared Bernstein
This accounting tweak by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will mean $60 billion for the U.S. government
Neil Irwin
A Thorough Summary of the Ferguson Fiasco
via Brad DeLong
Fact Finders (2005)
Jonathan Chait
Down the Up Staircase
Jared Bernstein
The Preferences of the Wealthy and Their Role in Our Politics
Antonio Fatás
Heritage study co-author opposed letting in immigrants with low IQs
Dylan Matthews
The Health Care “Market” is So Not a Market
Jared Bernstein
The Political Imbalance Facing Unions in America
Jared Bernstein
Boehner Accidentally Explains Why His Deficit Position Is Phony
Josh Barro
Are Stocks Cheap? A Review of the Evidence
Fernando Duarte and Carlo Rosa
The Four Noble Truths of Full Employment
Jared Bernstein
This accounting tweak by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will mean $60 billion for the U.S. government
Neil Irwin
A Thorough Summary of the Ferguson Fiasco
via Brad DeLong
Fact Finders (2005)
Jonathan Chait
Down the Up Staircase
Jared Bernstein
The Preferences of the Wealthy and Their Role in Our Politics
more from Larry Bartels:
Democracy and the Policy Preferences of Wealthy Americans (2013)
Economics Still Matters to Poorer Voters (2008)
Economic Inequality and Political Representation (2005)
and yet more: Do Politicians Serve the One Percent? Evidence in OECD Countries
P. Torija (2013)Let's get real about the stock market
Antonio Fatás
Heritage study co-author opposed letting in immigrants with low IQs
Dylan Matthews
The Health Care “Market” is So Not a Market
Jared Bernstein
The Political Imbalance Facing Unions in America
Jared Bernstein
Boehner Accidentally Explains Why His Deficit Position Is Phony
Josh Barro
Are Stocks Cheap? A Review of the Evidence
Fernando Duarte and Carlo Rosa
Filed under:
links
08 May 2013
Image of the Day - Tax Burden
Image of the Day: The relative burden on sales and income taxes, by income class.
Remember this when hucksters try to tell you that we'd be better off lowering income tax and raising sales tax. Find your place on this chart and decide if you'd be better off paying more in sales tax and less in income tax.
via
Quote of the Day - Coates
"One of the problems with the idea that America needs a 'Conversation On Race' is that it presumes that 'America' has something intelligent to say about race. All you need do is look at how American history is taught in this country to realize that that is basically impossible."
-Ta-Nehisi Coates
-Ta-Nehisi Coates
Filed under:
quote
Down the Up Staircase
This is where I was yesterday.
"NC has long been committed to solid education from early childhood interventions through their jewel-in-the-crown system of higher ed, along with maintaining some beautiful natural resources. The idea that they’ll seduce businesses to come to the state by shifting taxes from income to sales, while continuing a trend toward disinvestment in public goods like higher ed, natural resources, and infrastructure is exactly backwards."
05 May 2013
Matching Dilemma
Via The Onion: No One In Limo Going To Prom With The One They Wanted
Perhaps these guys could've done it better.
Perhaps these guys could've done it better.
Filed under:
quick
04 May 2013
Links of the Week - 3 May 2013
The Ignoramus Strategy
Paul Krugman
Lee Atwater’s Infamous 1981 Interview on the Southern Strategy
Rick Perlstein
Banks Have Become “Too Big To Fail” Again. Uh-Oh.
Simon Johnson
Tax Day!
Jared Bernstein
How to Save American Finance from Itself
Robert Solow
The incomparable economist
Paul Krugman
Samuelson Memorial
Paul Krugman
Hedging America
Robert Solow
Paul Krugman
Lee Atwater’s Infamous 1981 Interview on the Southern Strategy
Rick Perlstein
Banks Have Become “Too Big To Fail” Again. Uh-Oh.
Simon Johnson
Tax Day!
Jared Bernstein
How to Save American Finance from Itself
Robert Solow
The incomparable economist
Paul Krugman
Samuelson Memorial
Paul Krugman
Hedging America
Robert Solow
Filed under:
links
01 May 2013
Brad DeLong on "What is Macro?"
Brad DeLong:
This year I am on sabbatical--which means I do not teach. And I do miss it. Thus, from my perspective at least, this next hour is going to be an hour of pure fun.
I hope it will be an hour of pure fun for you all as well.
As Bob Strom said, right now in this MBA class you are transitioning from studying micro to studying macroeconomics. You are moving away from studying that part of economics where you talk about how the market system works well: how supply balances demand to make the maximum possible amount and value of win-win deals, and how people respond to the incentives they’re given to change their behavior. To the extent that things go wrong in microeconomics--to the extent that when you step back and look at the situation you say "Geewillickers! I really wish this had not happened!"--it is because you wish that you or the market system had not given people the incentives that it in fact did.
Practically everything that goes wrong in micro goes wrong because somewhere in the system some people have what we regard as the "wrong" incentives, and have responded to them. In such a situation you frantically scramble to fix it and correct it. And you do so by finding ways to change public policies so that people in fact have the right incentives.
Micro is somewhere between half and three-quarters of economics.
The other quarter or so of economics is macroeconomics.
Macro is different. Macro deals with the fact that sometimes the economy seems to have some sort of a grand mal epileptic seizure. It freezes up. Something goes mysteriously wrong--and wrong not with an individual firm, or an individual industry, or an individual sector of the labor market, but wrong with pretty much the whole thing. This happened to the US economy in 2008 and 2009.
link
I hope it will be an hour of pure fun for you all as well.
As Bob Strom said, right now in this MBA class you are transitioning from studying micro to studying macroeconomics. You are moving away from studying that part of economics where you talk about how the market system works well: how supply balances demand to make the maximum possible amount and value of win-win deals, and how people respond to the incentives they’re given to change their behavior. To the extent that things go wrong in microeconomics--to the extent that when you step back and look at the situation you say "Geewillickers! I really wish this had not happened!"--it is because you wish that you or the market system had not given people the incentives that it in fact did.
Practically everything that goes wrong in micro goes wrong because somewhere in the system some people have what we regard as the "wrong" incentives, and have responded to them. In such a situation you frantically scramble to fix it and correct it. And you do so by finding ways to change public policies so that people in fact have the right incentives.
Micro is somewhere between half and three-quarters of economics.
The other quarter or so of economics is macroeconomics.
Macro is different. Macro deals with the fact that sometimes the economy seems to have some sort of a grand mal epileptic seizure. It freezes up. Something goes mysteriously wrong--and wrong not with an individual firm, or an individual industry, or an individual sector of the labor market, but wrong with pretty much the whole thing. This happened to the US economy in 2008 and 2009.
link
Filed under:
quote
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

